The Good. The Bad. The Asinine.

An Open Letter To Trump Supporters


I’ve been seeing a lot of right wing and libertarian triumphalism on the internet these days, and fair enough too. We of the liberal elite, of which I am apparently a member despite living several rungs below the poverty line, have richly deserved our comeuppance. We have been calling you names and sneeringly accusing you of idiocy and stupidity for quite a while now, and I think you all definitely deserve your moment in the sun. You showed us. Okay, not particularly emphatically, but it doesn’t matter if it’s an inch or a mile, a win’s a win. And no, I’m not being patronising by quoting “Fast and Furious” instead of a more highbrow source – I sincerely mean it.

The thing that worries me, though, is that you seem to think that you’ve won something. I’m sorry, but the truth is that you just haven’t. If the measure of victory was the removal of smug, self-serving elites from the corridors of power, what’s been achieved here is not so much a victory as a swap. Trump himself belongs to an elite – I would have thought that was staringly obvious – and it’s one that’s significantly nastier and more grasping than the one which was rejected at the polls. He’s a part of the business elite, a group which will say anything to get what they want and then, unsurprisingly, do anything to achieve same without any real reference to any connection between the two. What you’ve chosen is definitely not someone who thinks of himself as a tribune of the plebs – what you’ve chosen is a charismatic CEO. Think about that for a second.

Add to this the man’s manifest incompetence. His bumbling unfamiliarity with political systems and processes may have been endearing in campaign mode, but it’s going to be a flat-out nightmare in office. And then there’s his belief in an America from the past. I’m not going to say that this will definitely fail, but I will say that it’s a massive, reckless gamble. It’s not just that the market forces which the right so worship have already rejected the industries that Trump seeks to revive, it’s also the fact that he’ll be trying to push these changes against the prevailing currents of the entire world. This could be seen as brave and radical, or, from my side of the fence, retrograde and stupid, but no matter where we sit on the political spectrum we can all agree that it’s going to be very, very risky. And it’s not his own money and future he’ll be gambling with. It’s yours. Assuming, of course, that the revivification of the urban manufacturing base wasn’t just another part of his sales pitch, like the vast majority of the things he’s said during the campaign.

My point is that there’s pain coming. And for me, a member of the liberal elite, it’s mainly going to be emotional pain. The world we’ve painstakingly been trying to build has taken a massive leap backwards. Okay, so we’re all sick of internet feminists and the perception that every prize and benefit should go only to one-legged Cambodian lesbians, but there’s a tragic irony in all of this. Yes, there was a loud and often juvenile focus on minorities, but the point of liberalism is to build a world in which everyone can safely live and prosper. And everyone necessarily includes you. But enough of my problems, really, because it’s not me and my kind who are going to do the most hurting. If this new experiment in populism goes the way I think it’s going to go, then the big losers are going to be the same people they always are. The working poor. The uneducated. Middle America. It doesn’t matter if the powers that be are left, right, in, out or shake it all about – when things go bad, it’s always the same people taking the shafting. Remember that, please, as we move on to my next point.

We have received a loud and clear message about connection. Smart-arses like myself allowed ourselves to drift so far from the reality of plurality that we stopped listening to huge blocs of people because we were too busy shouting about inclusiveness. I see the irony, and I take the point. But a Trump in the White House is not a win against that kind of thing, it’s a wildcard. Things are very unlikely to get any better in the long term, or possibly even in the medium or short term. Because the real war in politics is not between left and right, it’s between the powerful and the powerless. I agree – the political establishment no longer serves the needs of the people. But neither does the corporate or business establishment. In fact, they’ve been screwing we the people for longer, and with much more thoroughness, for the majority of this era. The thing to remember is that division is the easiest path to power for the unscrupulous. Right wing populists climb fissures in the electorate to achieve high office. If we truly want a system and establishment which serves our needs, we can’t allow that to happen – we must, must, must create a situation in which we actually choose our leaders from amongst the best candidates, instead of whatever the hell just happened at the last election.

So, for the hundredth time – can everyone please just stop with the childish shouting and start listening to each other?

Category: Bad, Politics


3 Responses

  1. lance says:

    I disagree entirely which is no surprise. First of all there was 16 other Republican candidates and Trump beat them all in the primaries. Isn’t that a much better process where Turnbull and Shorten are fostered upon us. At least with the primary system, voters of their registered party get to choose their nominee.

    Turnout in this election was at an all-time high, that showed that people cared enough to vote considering it’s voluntary over there.

    Anyway Donald Trump is the ultimate F-U to the establishment. Why can’t a person with no experience become President? Surely that’s the point. Discuss with me back in 2020. #kanyeforpresident

    • Nicola says:

      @lance Donald Trump is not a F-U to the establishement. He is a FU to the liberal establishment. He is still part of an elite establishment, which you fail to comprehend. As to whether a president needs experience, yes is the answer. You wouldn’t want someone without medical experience performing operations but you are happy to entrust national security, fiscal and social policy and world diplomacy to an amateur. If you think running a country is the same as running a company then you’re sadly mistaken.

  2. Chris says:

    I’d probably take a closer look at the way Primaries are actually run before praising them too much, Lance. And you seem to be forgetting that our local equivalent of POTUS is not the PM, it’s the queen, or GG if you like.

    And yes, I get that this was an engaged electorate this time around, and at no time have I disagreed with this. What I question is this ‘screw the establishment’ business. As I’ve pointed out above, Trump is simply from a different part of the establishment.

    Why can’t a person with no experience become the President? That’s a strange question, considering no first termer ever has any experience of being President, but I get that’s probably not what you mean.

    You say you’re disagreeing with me, but you’re not – you’re talking past me. The points you’ve raised are valid, but have little or nothing to do with what I’ve actually said. Apart, that is, from the fact that this whole article is a request that we stop talking past each other.

Leave a Reply